Yes, We Can (Ignore every other issue except abortion when it comes to voting)

Warning: controversy ahead!

I’ve written earlier on the dilemmas facing modern Catholics in America, and those dilemmas are all the more pressing in this election year. The NY Times has an excellent article on the Catholic vote, “Catholic Church Is Riven By Internal Debate,” and it cuts to the heart of the crisis of authority facing the Church in the US.

As I’ve said before, the middle ground is a tough place to be, especially when it comes to religion. When you take some things from the theological salad bar but leave some of them behind, part of you wonders why you’re even at the salad bar to begin with. The Church can’t show any cracks in its authority for fear that any compromise on its issues will lead to a slippery slope of moral relativism and eventual obsolescense.

Unfortunately, it’s not helping its cause when it tells Catholic voters to essentially Vote for McCain (and only for McCain and other anti-abortion public officials) Or Else. The article quotes one American bishop as saying:

Being ‘right’ on taxes, education, health care, immigration and the economy fails to make up for the error of disregarding the value of a human life. It is a tragic irony that ‘pro-choice’ candidates have come to support homicide — the gravest injustice a society can tolerate — in the name of ‘social justice.

Let’s rewind the clock and apply this logic to the year 2000. By this logic, even though George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and his Republican Pro-Life pals were wrong on Iraq, Hurricane Katrina, Abu Ghraib, the economy, torture, politicizing the Justice Department, domestic spying, and every other pathetic failure of the public trust over the last eight years, this is all somehow OK because at the end of the day they put two conservative judges on the Supreme Court who might someday possibly consider overturning Roe V. Wade?

Everyone gets it. Abortion is bad. Nobody wants Planned Parenthood to have people lining up outside the clinic for quick ‘n’ easy pregnancy terminations. Nobody wants a culture that disrespects human dignity and human life.

But do you know what else disrespects human dignity and human life? Denying access to sex education that will ultimately prevent abortions. Torturing prisoners of war. Supporting economic policies that keep poor people in the ditch. Launching an unjustified war. Sitting on your laurels while poor black people drown in New Orleans. Stoking hatred and vitriol against people in same sex relationships. Blindly trusting the free market to regulate itself while millions of American fall into the economic abyss.

I’m Catholic, I do respect life, and I’m not voting for a candidate just because they carry the anti-abortion flag into the battlefield. I do respect Catholics and others who want to vote their conscious and vote Pro-Life, but I’m Catholic, I’m voting my conscious, and I’m voting for Obama.

“Raised Catholic”: Religion in Modern America

How many times have you heard someone refer to themselves as “raised Catholic”? Quit often, right? Of course, those describing themselves as such are usually implying that they are no longer practicing Catholics, and anyone can anecdotally say that there’s a pretty large contingent in America that describes themselves as such.

Now there are some hard numbers to quantify this phenomenon. According to a recent study as reported by the New York Times that surveys religious life in America, Catholicism is taking a big hit:

The Catholic Church has lost more adherents than any other group: about one-third of respondents raised Catholic said they no longer identified as such. Based on the data, the survey showed, “this means that roughly 10 percent of all Americans are former Catholics.”

The article goes on to describe other trends, such as the influence of immigration on all religious groups, but as one of those who were “raised Catholic” yet is “still Catholic,” the parts about my particular faith were the most interesting to me. So I’m taking this opportunity to do a little soapbox publishing about religion.

Consider, for a moment, the strong deterrents that orthodox Catholicism has against leaving the Church (or not practicing the faith):

  • Going to mass on a weekly basis is an obligation. Failing to do so is a “mortal sin,” i.e. if you don’t do it, you’re goin’ to hell.
  • Attending confession with some frequency: ditto.
  • As a Catholic, you have been given the supreme gift of being able to receive Christ’s true Body and Blood in the Eucharist at the above mentioned weekly mass. If you turn you back on that, well, see above for the consequences.

Now, I am leaving out a lot of nuancy in modern Catholic teachings about religious pluralism and exercising faith as a conscious choice, not out of fear or obligation. But for many of those who were “raised Catholic,” they had to overcome these and other detterents in abandoning the practice of their faith.

How does one go about doing this? Quite easily. The Church’s authority, by and large, rests in its claim to being God’s Institution on Earth: Jesus made Peter his representative on Earth before he left, who then gave it to the next guy, who then gave it to the next guy, and so on and so on up to and including John Paul II, the last pope, and the lovable Benedict XVI, the current pope. Popes have the power to invoke “infallibility” (though they rarely do so). Catholic doctrine is sold by the orthodox Church establishment as the immutable, non-negotiable, set in stone Rules of God.

The problem with this structure, of course, is that when someone comes around to thinking that the Church *might actually be wrong* about *even one small tenent* of Catholicism, then this begins the classic “slippery slope” process of gradually questioning more and more of the churches beliefs until one eventually gives up on the whole Gosh-darn thing.

Today’s modern theologians essentially accept that Catholics living in a modern world really can’t honestly be expected to abide by 100% of the church’s teachings. Gay marriage? Condoms? True Body and Blood in the Eucharist? OK, you can disagree with the Church on those things (and maybe a few others), but as long as you get the “big picture,” love your neighbor, do charitable works, etc., then that’s fine.

But in come the orthodox theologians who hold disproportionate sway over the Church hierarchy. They decry this “Cafeteria Catholicism” and say that “the Church is not a Salad Bar!” That “slippery slope” of questioning and rejecting eventually leads to a quagmire of moral relativism and hedonism. A Church without absolute rules on moral Doctrine is a meaningless Church.

As far as I go, I could easily be described as a “Cafeteria Catholic,” but I fully understand all of those “raised Catholic” and orthodox theologians who can’t deal with this uneasy middle ground. It’s a difficult place to be, and I struggle with it every time I think about these big cosmic questions about religion and morality.

But I think everyone can agree that the institution of the Catholic Church in the modern age is facing a true crisis. Look at the empty cathedrals of Europe. Look at the hard numbers from the recent survey. Look at the settlement figures from the sex abuse lawsuits.

Recently, management consultants and environmentalists (strange bedfellows as they were) have pushed through a new buzzword into the modern lexicon that aptly describes this sort of situation:


In closing, I do want to reemphasize that I simplify a lot of Catholic doctrine for the sake of playing the Devil’s advocate. I’m sure many of you out there could cite plenty of official documents that counter a lot of what I said, but the sad truth is that Catholicism still has a “do these 10 things or you’re going to Hell” reputation about it. Whether that’s deserved or not is a separate discussion, but it has a lot to do with why people so often these days describe themselves as “raised Catholic.”